My Big GUTOE: Some Informative Videos

My Big GUTOE: The Videos

(© 2020, by K. P. Collins)

(06-19-2020)

The purpose of this WebLog is to provide a brief discussion of a few small video clips that assist in gaining an understanding of some of the "macroscopic atoms" that I discussed in my earlier WebLog explaining "Tapered Harmony", which is a Grand Unified Theory Of Everything that I've developed, and verified, using the published experimental results. If you've not yet read the earlier WebLog for comprehension, you should do so before, or immediately after, reading this and studying the video clips that accompany it. As a courtesy, I've kept the videos short, but by setting your video player to "repeat" and having each video playing while you read its correlated discussion (which discussion is provided immediately below each video's position in this document), or by briefly running and pausing each video to look at what you've read about, you'll be able to see and understand some of the routinely-occurring basic, but important, "properties" of all macroscopic atoms and how & why the Universal Extreme Fluid (UEF) instantiates and 'sustains' their existences.

The first video clip is of the macroscopic atom that occurs at the Chicopee Falls Dam (and at every other dam that exists, natural, man-made or beaver-made) following a relatively-heavy rainfall 'local' to the dam.

In heavy rainfalls, every dam transforms into "Nature's Monument Macroscopic Atoms". You want to understand how & why Physical Reality 'builds' such 'monuments', rather than allowing them to 'slip-by', 'seen', but unnoticed and unrecognized.

Look closely as the video clip plays, and you'll see that, relative to the uppermost band of 'light' ("visual spectrum" 'electromagnetic radiation'; 'em') that is being refracted through the water at the top of the dam, the water is at a a height that is 18-24 inches above the height of the dam.

This height differential exists because water is 'holding' ('sustaining' the existence of) water above the height of the dam in the same way that the Universal Extreme Fluid 'sustains' the dynamics of 'UEF-'containing'-UEF 'within' Spherical Standing Wave harmonics ("SSW harmonics", or "SSWs") that I explained in my earlier WebLog.

It is, in fact, the UEF that 'sustains' everything in 'both' cases (in all cases throughout Physical Reality).

The macroscopic, "water at a height above the height of the dam", atom consists solely of 'local' UEF 'sustaining' the 'containment' of the "hydrogen" and "oxygen" SSW harmonics (microscopic 'atoms') that the UEF 'combines into' and 'contains' 'within' all of the 'water molecules' included in 'the water flow', all in exact accord with the single maximum ephemerance (max-eph) dynamic ("ephemerance' being the UEF's "relative freedom to move") that I explained in my earlier WebLog.

Pause here to run the video until you understand that, although the 'water' is passing over the dam continuously, as it does so, the 'water', nevertheless, 'sustains' the existence of 'water' at a height above the height of the dam, with different 'water molecules' continuously 'passing through' the macroscopic atom, which macroscopic dynamic is 100% determined in the "UEF i/o" dynamics that were explained in my earlier WebLog.

This is not only exactly analogous to what occurs in the SSW case, it physically is the SSW case occurring 'within' the 'containment' dynamics of all of the SSW harmonics that comprise the 'water' that is passing over the dam.

View the video until you understand all of the above - until you see the UEF where you once saw only 'water'.

Next, pause the video again while you consider the fact that everything that is in the video for your viewing is 100% the same stuff explained above and in my earlier WebLog.

Which includes the macroscopic standing wave that occurs dynamically along the length of the section of the base of the dam that appears in the clip, which standing wave is exactly analogous to a macroscopic standing wave that occurs with respect to a violin string as it is 'sustained' by a Violinist and/or any string that's driven in periodically-oscillating (harmonic) motion. Each of these standing waves are 100% UEF 'containment' dynamics as such dynamics were explained in my earlier WebLog. In the case of the standing wave at the base of the dam, it's physically real work performed by the UEF (not 'action of the' non-physically-real so-called "force of gravity") that drives 'and' stands-up the macroscopic harmonics.

In the way that the 'crashing of water' along the bottom of the base of the dam 'sustains' (dynamically 'contains') stereotypical 'splashings-up' of 'water' at various heights, with each such 'splashing-up' constituting another dynamically instantiated and 'sustained' macroscopic atom occurring with 'power' that instantiates and 'sustains' 'splash'-height that's exactly coupled to the quantity of 'water flow' in any 'region' along the top of the 'dam, and the interactions of the 'splashings-up' constituting macroscopic 'molecules' occurring as macroscopic instances of the UEF-determined dynamics inherent in the microscopic UEF-sharing 'bonding' that I explained in my earlier WebLog, everything you see in the clip is 100% the UEF 'moving' everywhere with direction that is determined exclusively in the one max-eph dynamic.

Next, run the video clip again, this 'time' paying close attention to the dynamics that occur 'intermittently' below the central rock ledge 'depression' that's just downstream from the dam.

Although they are larger 'and' more-powerful, and occur in 'non-viscous water', these 'intermittent' dynamics occur in exactly the same, 100% UEF determined way as the 'squirting' of the ("Shampoo Experiment") secondary streams that were explained in my earlier WebLog. Run the video until you understand this.

You can see the same-stuff in the 'water' motion in an operating "agitator"-style washing machine, and every 'time' your Lovely Child hops, grinning all the while, into a puddle of water, your Child's Joy, in that 'moment', being that of an "Experimental Physicist" in 'then'-Fully-Blossoming-Brilliance. (Foster such, rather than 'quashing' it. Hop in the puddle too. Live Life with your Child, instead of 'deleting' Life from your Child. Explain to your Child what's happening as the water 'splashes', and why. The Joy your Child experiences derives in dynamics occurring 'within' the Child's nervous system (which are also 100% max-eph determined) in which everything I've discussed above is fleetingly 'recognized' (without words being attached) as being what it physically is. Help your Child realize that this great wonder is occurring 'within' her or his Being. Subsequently, you'll witness the Gift of Understanding that you've given your Child blossoming throughout the full spectrum of your Child's development, and you'll experience a correlated Joy, over and over again.)

Every 'wave' dynamic that occurs in the 'water' downstream from the dam, and all of the 'seeming calm' of the 'water' upstream of the dam, is 100% the UEF 'moving' relative to the one max-eph dynamic.

Study these downstream 'wave' dynamics carefully, and you'll see a spreading of direction as the UEF carries the SSWs constituting 'the water' while 'moving' in the direction of its 'local' max-eph.

You'll see this same UEF 'movement' direction 'spreading' in all of the "Shampoo Experiment" videos that follow.

The rest of Physical Reality, same-old, same-old.

For instance, 'the water' that 'flows' over the Chicopee Falls Dam doesn't, as has been 'presumed' in tradition, ''flow downhill' 'because it is attracted toward the center of Earth by gravity'.

There exists no such thing as so-called "attractive gravity" in Physical Reality.

After a heavy rainfall, 'the water' 'flows uphill' 'locally'-upstream relative to the dam to the degree that the ephemerance of the UEF that's 'contained' and 'sustained' 'within', shared amongst, and entrained with respect to, the physical existences of the SSW harmonics ('atoms and molecules') that constitute 'the water' decreases (to the degree that the freedom to 'move' of this UEF becomes reduced (becomes restricted)).

The 'piling-up' of 'the water' to a height greater than the height of the dam is instantiated and 'sustained' in this 'local' UEF ephemerance decrease and nothing else.

Throughout all of Physical Reality, all 'movement' of so-called "matter" is 100% determined in exactly analogous relative UEF ephemerance dynamics and nothing else.

There exists no so-called "dark energy" or "dark matter" in Physical Reality. Everything that's been 'presumed to be correlated to them' derives completely in the UEF 'moving' in the direction of max-eph.

The only stuff that actually Exists in Physical Reality is the UEF. Everything else is dynamically instantiated and 'sustained' in the UEF by the UEF.

Including with respect to every 'atom' that comprises every 'molecule' that comprises every 'cell', that comprises 'the body' of every "Physicist", even though 'every' "Physicist" has traditionally 'moved away from' Truth with respect to the UEF.

Which instance of 'physics' 'moving away from' everything that physically exists is funny (forgive me please for pointing it out, I do so with compassion.)

The next video is a snippet clipped from what was my first Johnson's Baby Shampoo™ Experiment.

There are four main things that are easy to see in this video clip in which three "primary streams" are flowing from the holes I punched through the bottom of a 35mm photographic film container that I used as the shampoo reservoir that was shown in a photo in my earlier WebLog but is out-of-frame above the glass in this video clip. (Historical note: My Dad made the coffee table upon which the glass rests out of thick oak planks that he'd previously used to cover the really-useful automobile-servicing "pit" he and I built together in the garage attached to our home. It had concrete walls, 'electrical' service, 'lighting', compressed air, and handy tool shelves. We spent many pleasant 'hours', both together and separately, down in "the pit". In addition to oil changes, lube jobs, and exhaust systems, I swapped an "M22 Rock Crusher"™ 4-speed manual transmission and "Hurst"™ shifter into my '63 Corvette™ while "looking up from down in the pit". The oak planks became 'surplus' when Dad and I filled in "the pit" many 'years later', which was a 'sad day' for me, and, I think, for Dad, too, but he never let on about it. "Waste not, want not", Dad made this extremely-sturdy (and heavy) coffee table using a few of the planks. Dad liked extremely-sturdy stuff. Good memories of his work, and mine. "Together", in a lot of ways all at once.)

The four things are:

1. the building and depletion of the fluid 'mounds',

2. the instantiation of "secondary streams",

3. the fleeting wave dynamics that occur relative to the surface of the receiving pool of shampoo when the secondary streams impinge 'upon' it.

Play the video clip on "repeat" until you've become 'familiar' with these three main things that are easy to see in the video. Try to "catch a squirt" using your video player's "Pause" button, which is hard to do, but fun trying to do - like a hard-to-win video game.

Everything that can be observed in this video clip occurs continuously.

The continuous building and depletion of the fluid 'mounds' that was explained in my earlier WebLog, and which can be easily observed in all three 'mounds', is exactly analogous to the way that continuous UEF dynamics instantiate and 'sustain' harmonics 'within' SSWs, and with respect to which the so-called "emission" and "absorption" "line spectra" which are also instantiated harmonically by the UEF and nothing else. The exactness and mutual continuities of the microscopic and macroscopic fluid dynamics derives the fact that the macroscopic fluid dynamics are comprised solely of microscopic Universal Extreme Fluid (UEF) dynamics, the one 'additional' thing being that the rate at which the macroscopic fluid dynamics occur is extremely slow relative to the UEF dynamics through which it is instantiated. This extreme rate differential derives exactly in the 'side' dynamics that are simultaneously 'carried out' by the UEF with respect to SSW 'containment', 'sustenance' and UEF sharing ('chemical bonding') in which the 'viscosity' of the shampoo derives. (The UEF can be, and will be, studied via the myriad variations of such rate differentials that routinely occur at all scales of Physical Reality, which, when taken together, constitute a "UEF-microscope/telescope" methodology.)

Also occurring in the video, but less apparent, is

4. the 'sub-surface' UEF 'flow' and 3D spreading that is 100% determined with respect to UEF ephemerance as the UEF 'local' to the shampoo in the receiving pool 'moves' in the direction of max-eph, which is rendered observable in the movements of sub-surface "bubbles" ("encapsulations"). The rate differentials discussed above are part of this fourth set of observables, and also some of what, at first, makes this fourth thing 'less apparent' because you have to factor relative rates into the dynamics before their unity becomes readily apparent. (These same dynamics are more easily observed from the lower camera angle I used in the next video clip below.)

Each of these fluid dynamics reduce to UEF ephemerance and nothing else.

The next video is a snippet clipped from a subsequent instance of the Johnson's Baby Shampoo™ Experiment.

Things to observe in this video:

1. There are very interesting refraction dynamics that occur throughout it, in particular just above the surface of the receiving pool and 'highlighted' in the 'region' where, due to (fortunate) sloppiness in my technique during this trial, I dripped some shampoo onto the camera-near 'side' of the glass. Two other particularly interesting refraction dynamics occur near the 'bottom' of the fluid-containing part of the glass, one of which (the one on the left) corresponds to the dripping that occurred as my film-container reservoir was running out of shampoo, and the other of which (the one on the right) corresponds to the fluid dynamics (harmonics) of the 'mound' occurring above the surface of the receiving pool on the left. (The relatively bright 'zones' are artifacts of the 'lighting' I used during this trial and the refractory dynamics of the glass, and which I didn't note until after I shot the video. If I had, I could've adjusted the 'lighting' to cast them away from the camera's lens. (Just giving you a "heads-up" for when you do your own shampoo experiment.))

2. the UEF spreading dynamics are too numerous to comment upon except that they all occur exactly with respect to the one max-eph dynamic. Watch the clip on "repeat" until you see them 'all', including the sub-surface correlates of the above-surface secondary streams and the wave dynamics that they instantiate.

3. Note how the "bubble clouds" (which remain from earlier in the trial) 'jump back' when the video period repeats, which assists in your seeing the slow fluid dynamic spreading that is coupled exactly to the UEF as it 'moves' with respect to its 'sustaining' of the SSW harmonics that comprise the "shampoo", so 'moving' solely with respect to the max-eph dynamic, as does everything else in this video.

The next video is clipped from a "bowl" trial of the Johnson's Baby Shampoo™ Experiment. There's a lot happening simultaneously in it, so I encourage you to give it some "repeat" viewing.

Because of the continuity inherent in the dynamics 'shown' (in a "frame"-delimited way) in it, there is an infinite quantity of information in this video, but it all reduces directly to the single max-eph dynamic. If your video player has a "slow-speed" feature, use it while viewing this clip.

1. There are very interesting refraction dynamics that occur throughout it, in particular:

1. Observe the 'light bar' that 'dances' 'in' the far 'side' of the bowl, which is UEF refraction 'originating' from the 'illumination' that I used during this trial,  'moving' via the single stream that's being poured directly from the shampoo container, to the far 'side' of the bowl (and beyond). The correlated 'fringing' dynamic near the top of the bowl is UEF refracted from the surface of the receiving pool where the stream of shampoo merges with it. The "fringing' is UEF refraction deriving in the dynamically-instantiated elevation differentials of the fluid 'mound' as the stream merges with the receiving pool. (The actual "origination" of these UEF refractory (max-eph-directed 3D UEF 'movement') dynamics is in the primordial UEF decompaction that is WDB2T.)

2. See the UEF spreading with respect to the max-eph dynamic as this spreading is disclosed in the motions of the bubbles.

3. The stuff that I referred to as being "spectacular" in my earlier WebLog is the way the refractory dynamics that result from the fact that the 'point' of entry of the stream of shampoo is in a 'mound' that is dynamically elevated above the surface of the receiving pool. Such fluid-dynamic 'mounds' that occur at heights above the surfaces of receiving fluid pools always constitute macroscopic atoms - in exactly the same, 100% UEF determined, way that the Chicopee Falls Dam macroscopic atom was instantiated and 'sustained'. Same-Old, same-old, 'but' with different relative 'powers' that nevertheless remain exactly determined with respect to the one max-eph dynamic.

It's the 'elevation' of the fluid 'mound' that renders the 'movements' of the UEF observable relative to the highly directionally restricted UEF ephemerance that is what so-called "light' ("electromagnetic radiation") physically is. Observe the 'light'-refraction dynamics, through which you can see the 'head' and 'tail' of the 'mound'-refracted UEF 'movement' dynamics, in particular, with respect to the 'wagging of the tail' which 'traces' the spreading of the UEF as the UEF 'moves' in way that's exactly coupled to the max-eph dynamic (as the elevation of the fluid 'mound' diminishes as the fluid 'contained within' the 'mound' merges into the receiving pool). This 'tail wagging' refraction dynamic continuously (exactly) 'traces' the path of the fluid dynamics inherent in the merging of the stream with the receiving pool. The dynamic narrowing of the 'tail' is coupled exactly to the height of the 'mound' 'local' to the 'instantaneous' width of the 'tail', which is 100% determined in the UEF 'moving' in it's 'local' max-eph direction, including all of the physically real work the UEF does in 'containing' and 'sustaining' the SSW harmonics that comprise the "shampoo", including all of the UEF i/o of the SSWs, including all of the UEF sharing ('chemical bonding') that occurs amongst the SSWs ('atoms' 'and' 'molecules' (so-called "molecules" are actually macroscopic atoms)), and including all UEF entrainment dynamics 'local' to the SSWs comprising the "shampoo", including the simultaneous combination of all of which that is the collective action of the UEF that dynamically 'sustains' the elevation of the 'mound' at heights above the surface of the receiving pool.

This's a lot, so I encourage you to "get comfortable" and watch the video until you understand all of the above and everything that I explained in my earlier WebLog.

I was 'planning' to do more in this WebLog, but I've had a toothache for a 'while' and have been both too busy and too poor to go to a Dentist. I'd finally saved enough, and had reached the 'point' at which I decided that I'd have to get it taken care of and 'then' the 'novel' Corona Virus happened which closed all dentist offices.

So I've been 'stuck' with my 'screaming toothache'.

Doing what needs to be done, "Anyway".

TGLk.

k. p. collins